Curious about what’s really behind Project 2025? In this episode, we continued our journey through the foreword of the Project 2025, its policy agenda, and break down what its language, goals, and political implications could mean for the future of the U.S. government.

In this video, I break down the education philosophy behind Project 2025, rooted in Milton Friedman’s 1955 essay, “The Role of Government in Education.” From school vouchers to the dismantling of the Department of Education, I explore how this conservative education policy could reshape public schooling, parental rights, and the role of government in the classroom. I discuss how Friedman’s ideas are influencing current proposals, the risks and benefits of school choice, and what it means for families, teachers, and students across the U.S. Definitely watch if you’re interested in education reform, libertarian policy, or the broader goals of Project 2025.

Project 2025 is more than just policy—it's a strategy to reshape American democracy. In this video, I break down the foreword (pages 5-8) of the Project 2025 agenda, focusing on power consolidation, censorship, and the push for Christian nationalism.

Adult child estrangement is a real thing. Up to 27% of people in the US are estranged from someone in their family. That’s almost 1 out of 3 people that are estranged from someone, though not necessarily a parent. I’ve seen a lot of “parent pity” content online and in the media recently, and I wanted to talk about this from my own perspective. Parents are not victims when they treat their children badly. Once their children become adults, and those children can make their own choices about whether or not they want to put up with their parents’ ill treatment any longer, parents shouldn’t be surprised when the consequences of their own actions cause a rift in the family.

We begin going through the 17-page foreword. Kevin Roberts' misguided ideas are on full display in the first three pages.

I discuss pages xiii and xiv in Project 2025, define "Administrative State" and how it doesn't make sense to dismantle it, and "cultural marxism" and how that doesn't make sense at all.

Strap in! This is a long one. We're just getting to know the main authors and Advisory Board in this conversation. This is mostly background information, but it's still good information to know.

I point out the strategies, tactics, and, frankly, propaganda, coming from The Heritage Foundation. Why are they "the right people" for influencing the president and telling them how to do their job?